Opinion

Higher bond yields are raising the bar for stocks: Stan Wong

Published: 

The U.S. Department of the Treasury building is seen in Washington, Saturday, Dec. 7, 2024. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

For much of this year, “higher for longer” was a warning. Now it is a market reality.

With the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield above 5.25 per cent and touching a two-decade high, borrowing costs are becoming harder for markets to ignore. Bonds also compete more directly with equities for investor capital.

The implications for equity valuations are significant. When investors can earn an attractive return from high-quality bonds, stocks have to offer a more compelling combination of earnings growth, cash flow, and valuation to justify the additional risk. Higher yields do not automatically mean lower stock prices, but they do raise the hurdle.

There is another side to the equation. Higher long-term yields can also reflect stronger economic growth. If rising yields are accompanied by healthy demand and stronger corporate earnings, equities can continue to perform well. The key is why yields are rising. Growth-driven increases are very different from those driven primarily by inflation or fiscal concerns.

The Fed faces a delicate balance

That distinction is becoming increasingly important for the U.S. Federal Reserve. September U.S. employment data showed a clear loss of momentum, while the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2 per cent.

The softer labour backdrop reduced expectations for another near-term rate hike, but inflation remains above target and energy costs have risen. The Fed is balancing two competing considerations: avoiding unnecessary pressure on a slowing labour market while ensuring inflation continues moving in the right direction.

A moderating economy could eventually give policymakers greater flexibility. For now, incoming inflation and labour data will remain important.

Oil prices complicate the picture

Oil prices add another layer of complexity. Brent crude is trading above US$100 a barrel, and OPEC+ has confirmed that November production targets will remain unchanged. Global supply risks remain unresolved, keeping energy markets tight.

A sustained further rise would add pressure to inflation, consumers, and corporate margins, although the impact would not be uniform. Higher prices can support energy-sector earnings, while strong economic demand can also contribute to firmer oil prices. The key question is whether higher oil begins to materially weaken demand or margins.

Strong earnings remain an important support

The picture beneath the major indexes is more mixed. Fewer than half of S&P 500 stocks are currently trading above their 200-day moving average, even as the index remains relatively close to its highs. A relatively narrow group of large-cap leaders continues to do much of the heavy lifting.

That puts even more emphasis on earnings. Investors should watch both results and what management teams say about margins and demand. Companies with strong free cash flow, healthy balance sheets and sustainable pricing power should be well positioned in a higher-rate environment.

More importantly, the earnings backdrop remains strong. The S&P 500’s forward price-to-earnings ratio has fallen to roughly 20 times from about 22 times earlier this year. That valuation compression reflects, in part, forward earnings estimates rising faster than stock prices. Bloomberg consensus estimates point to earnings growth of more than 16 per cent in each of 2027 and 2028.

Stocks are not necessarily cheap, but earnings are doing more of the heavy lifting. If profits continue to rise near current expectations, equities may be able to absorb higher yields better than the interest-rate headlines alone would suggest.

History offers a constructive signal

Seasonality offers another constructive signal. Going back to 1950, the S&P 500 has been higher 12 months after each of the 19 U.S. midterm elections over that period. That does not make the pattern a forecast, but with the 2026 midterms approaching, it remains a noteworthy tendency.

The backdrop is more balanced than the level of bond yields alone might suggest. Higher rates and energy prices present challenges, while resilient growth, strong earnings and less demanding valuations continue to provide support.

Keep the bigger picture in view

The key question is not whether higher yields are inherently good or bad, but how they change the trade-offs across asset classes. Attractive bond yields can provide more income and diversification, while equities continue to offer longer-term growth potential.

The appropriate balance will depend on time horizon, liquidity needs, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Higher yields may justify adjustments at the margin, but they should not dictate strategy on their own.

Higher yields are raising the bar for stocks, but resilient growth and strong earnings suggest that bar may still be achievable. Any portfolio response should ultimately be considered within the context of each investor’s broader total wealth plan.